Courtesy: Consilium-European Union
by James Corbett
One thing you learn after spending years in the conspiracy realist space: when the globalists tell you that something is about to happen, you’d better believe they’re hard at work behind the scenes to make that “prediction” a reality.
For example, when 9/11 suspect Philip Zelikow takes to the pages of Foreign Affairs to “warn” about the “imminent threat” of “Catastrophic Terrorism” that, “like Pearl Harbor,” will “divide our past and future into a before and after,” you’d better believe his neocon cronies are about to deliver a 9/11 to the public.
When Bill Gates “warns” us that “we’re not ready” for what he calls “the next epidemic,” you’d better believe that he’s using his monopolization of global “health” to prime the pump for the COVID scamdemic.
When Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping released a joint statement vowing to “accelerate the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” by cooperating on “key areas” like “vaccines and epidemics control, financing for development, climate change, sustainable development, including green development, industrialization, digital economy, and infrastructure connectivity,” you’d better believe they are actively collaborating on the promotion of an AI-driven, Fourth Industrial Revolution globalist agenda with their WEF cronies.
And when the globalists release a detailed timeline telling you exactly what the next steps are in the rollout of the global biosecurity security state, you’d better believe they are hard at work erecting that enslavement grid as we speak.
Luckily for us, we do not need to be mind readers or fortune-tellers to know what the globalists are preparing for our dystopian future. We simply have to read their documents. And boy, have they released some real doozies in the past month: three documents that lay out a precise timeline and an overview of what they’re hoping to achieve and how they’re hoping to achieve it.
Today, let’s examine these documents so that we can better understand what we’re up against and form a more effective plan for derailing this agenda of control.
DOCUMENT #1: The European Council’s Handy-dandy Infographic Timeline
Earlier this month, the European Council released a document laying out the EUreaucrats’ own timetable for the implementation of global health tyranny. Entitled “Infographic – Towards an international treaty on pandemics,” it cuts down on all those complicated linguistic thingies—what do you call them again? words?—and reduces the complexities of a legally binding global pandemic treaty down to the lowest common denominator: the “infographic.”
With this Buzzfeed-worthy gimmick in hand, the European Council wastes no time in getting down to business, informing us that “On 3 March 2022, the Council adopted a decision to authorize the opening of negotiations for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response” before patting itself on the back for its role in proposing the idea of a global pandemic treaty in the first place:
So far, so unsurprising. This is the exact kind of mealy-mouthed “global approach” blah blah blah “common cause” yadda yadda “protecting health” pabulum that you would expect the global technocratic class to administer in a document like this.
Then, they lay out an incredibly abbreviated history of how we have arrived at the proposal for a global health tyranny.
You’ll note that this curiously truncated “history” unhelpfully informs you that 2021 was “only the second time in WHO history that its governing body . . . met for a second time in the same year” without bothering to link you to the list of World Health Assembly meetings. If they had bothered to do so, as I do here, you could see for yourself that the first time this two-meetings-in-one-year event happened was back in 2006, when the WHO met in May to discuss “Strengthening pandemic-influenza preparedness and response” in the context of the newly revised International Health Regulations and then again in November of that year to appoint Margaret Chan as the organization’s Executive Director.
It’s not hard to understand why they leave out that part of the history, though. Not only would it be too much information to include in their childish infographic, but it also might have prompted you to learn more about the creation of the “public health emergency of international concern” that was then invoked by Chan during the ginned-up swine flu “pandemic” of 2009 (and again during the ebola “pandemic” of 2014) to justify the consolidation of WHO powers in the dawning era of biosecurity. And, obviously, that kind of history is not what the European Council is aiming for here.
Back to the document:
Next, we see what is really at stake in this seemingly innocuous proposal for a global pandemic treaty. We learn that what is really being proposed is not that political blather about “banding together for a common cause” but creating a legally binding agreement to govern the global response to global public health “crises” (real or imaginary). Don’t worry, though, this agreement—in addition to promoting the sharing of genetic data and samples among WHO member countries—is rooted in the constitution! . . . The WHO constitution, that is, not your silly, outdated national constitution. This agreement will override that.
At last, we arrive at the juicy part:
And so we discover the real roadmap for the creation of the biosecurity state as the European Council sees it. First, there will be a meeting of an “intergovernmental negotiating body” to discuss progress on a draft for the globalist “health” takeover. “What body? Representing which governments? Convening under what authority? And represented by whom, exactly?” you might ask if you were the sort to question the information that is forcibly shoved down your throat by the self-proclaimed authorities. But relax, dude! This is an infographic, not one of those complicated overly talky explainer doohickeys! Just turn off your mind, relax and float downstream with the European Council and whoever else is steering this ship!
Next, we learn that this “negotiating body”—” Is this an official body? Who gets to decide who is appointed to this body? Is it part of the WHO itself?” . . . but there you go again with those pesky questions—will deliver a “progress report” to the WHO’s annual-ish meeting next year. (Now don’t go asking what this progress report will consist of, how it will be delivered, who will review it, or what these unnamed officials will do with it! That’s way more information than these poor infographic designers could possibly supply you with!)
And then, in May 2024, the “proposed instrument” will be presented for adoption at the WHO’s World Health Assembly, and the biosecurity takeover will be complete. Think of it as Patriot Act 2.0, but global. And focused on medical martial law.
Finally, our friends at the European Council put our minds at ease about why a legally binding global agreement is needed after all:
You see, it’s just about keeping you safe in the loving arms of the de facto global health tyranny so that they can implement long-term fascism at all levels! Nothing to see here, right?
So there you have it, folks: we have two years left before they close the barn door on health freedom at the global governmental level. At least, according to the European Council.
But why listen to the EU, you might ask? Good question. The simple answer is that they have a track record of correctly “predicting” the next moves in the erection of the medical martial law grid. Remember when the European Commission released the snappily named “Roadmap for the Implementation of Actions by the European Commission Based on the Commission Communication and the Council Recommendation on Strengthening Cooperation against Vaccine-Preventable Diseases” back in 2019? No? Well, let me refresh your memory:
Ahhh, right. It just so happens that the EUreaucrats were forecasting the creation of a vaccination card/passport for EU citizens in 2022 just months before the scamdemic was launched. Coincidence, I’m sure.