AUSTRALIA – First 2 doses provides 4% protection, but the 3rd provides 64% protection. Huh?

  • Reading time:4 mins read
You are currently viewing AUSTRALIA – First 2 doses provides 4% protection, but the 3rd provides 64% protection. Huh?

Can it get weirder than this? Australian minister says the first two doses only provide 4% protection but the third dose provides 64%. So you can’t relax after taking the first two doses.

Australia has been the ground zero for tyrannical Covid measures and they proved that to the world by making an example out Novak Djokovic. But now almost everywhere in the world, the Covid narrative is collapsing. UK prime minister Boris Johnson has decided to end Covid passports, mask mandates and work restrictions. Although it is up for speculation for what reasons did they take this step as it is difficult to trust any government right now.

The rush to push the boosters is getting comical, to say the least. Watch:

From the start of this year, we have been seeing various media personalities seriously push for boosters. Albert Bourla Pfizer CEO admitted, “The first two doses provide very limited protection if any”. Pfizer first marketed their vaccines with an efficacy of 95%. But now the CEO has himself admitted they provide no protection. A team of Canadian Doctors proved that the claim of 95% efficacy is a fluke and in reality, Pfizer vaccines only have 0.8% efficacy.

Bourla is now claiming their fourth shot will definitely target Omicron. But studies from Israel have claimed the fourth shot is ineffective as well. How long will they keep this charade up? A better question would be how long people will still believe in this nonsense?

Highly Effective:

Albert Einstein once said, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”. Humanity is under mass psychosis. They will keep taking this poison and expect better immunity than before. Nothing can be further the truth.

On this web page* you can find links to more than one thousand scientific studies and articles discussing adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines. All of the studies have been authored by scientists and medical professionals. All of them have appeared in scientific and medical journals and publications. Most of them have been peer-reviewed. All of them present serious work by serious researchers. (source)

Some of the post-vaccine adverse reactions that these studies describe include:

  • Fatal cerebral hemorrhage
  • Venous thrombosis
  • Immune thrombocytopenic purpura
  • Myocarditis
  • Pericarditis
  • Myopericarditis
  • Death
  • Guillain-Barré syndrome
  • Acute venous thromboembolism
  • Lymphadenopathy
  • Acute thrombosis of the coronary tree
  • Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
  • Portal vein thrombosis
  • T-cell lymphoma
  • Aphasia
  • Anaphylaxis
  • Cardiomyopathy
  • Thrombophilia

This is only a partial list of vaccinal afflictions. How can anyone claim with a straight face that the Covid-19 vaccines are completely safe? Anyone who tells you these vaccines are “completely safe” is lying through his/her teeth.

But as Dr. Sherry Tenpenny has pointed out most people will only realize the truth when they lose their children or loved ones. And then it will be too late.